Nursing Faculty

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/10294/5375

Browse

Browsing Nursing Faculty by Author "Chipanshi, Mary"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Ethical challenges regarding emerging digital technologies in virtual nursing care and practice [Evidence brief]
    (The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council in collaboration with the Future Skills Centre, 2022-04) Arries-Kleyenstuber, Ebin; Davies, Shauna; Luhanga, Florence; Chipanshi, Mary; Cosford, Kristen; Azogu, Irene
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Factors contributing to practitioner choice when declining involvement in legally available care: A scoping protocol
    (BMJ, 2018-07-27) Brown, Janine; Goodridge, Donna; Thorpe, Lilian; Chipanshi, Mary
    As legislation addressing medical treatments continues to evolve, there are several circumstances (eg, abortion, assisted dying) in which health practitioners may choose to not provide legally available care options. It is not always clear what underlies practitioner choice, as some research has suggested non-participation in care provision is not always due to an ethical abstention but may represent other factors. This results in tension between a practitioner’s right to refrain from practices deemed morally objectionable by the practitioner, and the care recipient’s right to access legally available treatments. The aim of this systematic scoping review is to identify the current knowledge regarding all the factors influencing practitioner’s choices when declining involvement in legally available healthcare options.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Factors influencing practitioners’ who do not participate in ethically complex, legally available care: scoping review
    (BioMed Central (BMC), 2021-09-28) Brown, Janine; Goodridge, Donna; Thorpe, Lilian; Hodson, Alexandra; Chipanshi, Mary
    Evolving medical technology, advancing biomedical and drug research, and changing laws and legislation impact patients’ healthcare options and influence healthcare practitioners’ (HCPs’) practices. Conscientious objection policy confusion and variability can arise as it may occasionally be unclear what underpins non-participation. Our objective was to identify, analyze, and synthesize the factors that influenced HCPs who did not participate in ethically complex, legally available healthcare.