Legitimacy on Trial: A Process for Appointing Justices to the Supreme Court of Canada

dc.contributorJohnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy
dc.contributor.authorPeach, Ian
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-03T19:36:00Z
dc.date.available2016-03-03T19:36:00Z
dc.date.issued2005-02
dc.description.abstractThe Prime Minister’s unfettered power to appoint Justices to the Supreme Court of Canada has long been a subject of controversy, and the recent federal election campaign raised the profile of the issue once again. Nonetheless, the Supreme Court of Canada is generally a well-respected institution and its Justices are seen as highly professional and highly skilled jurists. Thus, ideas for alternative appointment processes are themselves often subject to criticism for their potential to politicize the appointment process and cause the best candidates to exclude themselves from consideration.en_US
dc.description.authorstatusFacultyen_US
dc.description.peerreviewyesen_US
dc.identifier.isbn0-7731-0514-X
dc.identifier.issn1702-7802
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10294/6684
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSaskatchewan Institute of Public Policyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSIPP Public Policy Papersen_US
dc.subjectSaskatchewan Institute of Public Policyen_US
dc.titleLegitimacy on Trial: A Process for Appointing Justices to the Supreme Court of Canadaen_US
dc.typereporten_US
oaire.citation.volume30

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
SIPP Public Policy Papers 30.pdf
Size:
178.33 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.24 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: