Can Social Media Participation Enhance LGBTQ+ Youth Well-Being? Development of the Social Media Benefits Scale

dc.contributor.authorEaton, Andrew
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T19:54:10Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T19:54:10Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-23
dc.descriptionThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).en_US
dc.description.abstractSocial media sites offer critical opportunities for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, and other sexual and/or gender minority (LGBTQ+) youth to enhance well-being through exploring their identities, accessing resources, and connecting with peers. Yet extant measures of youth social media use disproportionately focus on the detrimental impacts of online participation, such as overuse and cyberbullying. This study developed a Social Media Benefits Scale (SMBS) through an online survey with a diverse sample (n = 6,178) of LGBTQ+ youth aged 14–29. Over three-quarters of the sample endorsed non-monosexual and/or and gender fluid identities (e.g., gender non-conforming, non-binary, pansexual, bisexual). Participants specified their five most used social media sites and then indicated whether they derived any of 17 beneficial items (e.g., feeling connected, gaining information) with the potential to enhance well-being from each site. An exploratory factor analysis determined the scale’s factor structure. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Sheffe post hoc tests examined age group differences. A four-factor solution emerged that measures participants’ use of social media for: (1) emotional support and development, (2) general educational purposes, (3) entertainment, and (4) acquiring LGBTQ+-specific information. Bartlett’s test of sphericity was significant (χ2 = 40,828, p < .0005) and the scale had an alpha of .889. There were age group differences for all four factors (F = 3.79–75.88, p < .05). Younger adolescents were generally more likely to use social media for beneficial factors than older youth. This article discusses the scale’s development, exploratory properties, and implications for research and professional practice.en_US
dc.description.authorstatusFacultyen_US
dc.description.peerreviewyesen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by Insight and Partnership Grants from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC #495-2015-0780 and #895-2018-1000). Shelley L. Craig is the Canada Research Chair in Sexual and Gender Minority Youth. A.D.E. holds a salary award from the Ontario HIV Treatment Network (OHTN).en_US
dc.identifier.citationCraig SL, Eaton AD, McInroy LB, Leung VWY, Krishnan S. Can Social Media Participation Enhance LGBTQ+ Youth Well-Being? Development of the Social Media Benefits Scale. Social Media + Society. January 2021. doi:10.1177/2056305121988931en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/2056305121988931
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10294/14811
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSocial Media + Societyen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectLGBTQ+ youth, well-being, social media, factor analysis, scale developmenten_US
dc.titleCan Social Media Participation Enhance LGBTQ+ Youth Well-Being? Development of the Social Media Benefits Scaleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2056305121988931.pdf
Size:
310.96 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections