Health Profession Organizations in the Health Policy Process: A Comparative Case Study of Ontario and Saskatchewan

dc.contributor.advisorMcIntosh, Tom
dc.contributor.advisorMarchildon, Gregory
dc.contributor.authorSchell, Olena
dc.contributor.committeememberZarzecny, Amy
dc.contributor.committeememberCmillo, Cheryl
dc.contributor.committeememberUrban, Ann-Marie
dc.contributor.externalexaminerBourgeault, Ivy Lynn
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-13T17:06:26Z
dc.date.available2021-12-13T17:06:26Z
dc.date.issued2021-07
dc.descriptionA Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Public Policy, University of Regina. x, 316 p.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation examined the factors that contributed to the increase of the professional autonomy for the nursing, pharmacy, and dietetics in Ontario and Saskatchewan. Using concepts drawn from the literatures of medical dominance and professional autonomy, this study applied and modified the advocacy coalition framework to examine the complex network of medical knowledge and health stakeholders involved in this health policy subsystem. A comparative case study explored the institutions that shape PHC services within their provincial health care systems, as well as the political and social contexts that propelled the idea of expanding scopes of practice within PHC reform efforts. This case study demonstrated that despite the increased recognition of the expertise of health professions to apply medical knowledge in a broader manner for PHC, the structural embeddedness of medical dominance within health care systems continues to reinforce the central role of the medical profession in health care. In Ontario, policymakers have taken a heavy-handed approach to implementing policy decisions that affect the division of health labour, while health professions continue to maintain control over these decisions in Saskatchewan. In both provinces, health professional organizations have greater influence over policy decisions that affect the regulation and scopes of practice of their members, but little influence of funding decisions and governance structures of PHC models. In addition, PHC funding are still largely dependent on the outcomes of the physician services negotiations. This dissertation demonstrated that while health professions have increased their clinical and political autonomies to some extent, medical dominance continues to affect the division of health labour. These results highlight the futility of provinces to achieve PHC reform efforts when policy decisions continue to reinforce the central role of the medical profession in the delivery of health care.en_US
dc.description.authorstatusStudenten
dc.description.peerreviewyesen
dc.identifier.tcnumberTC-SRU-14466
dc.identifier.thesisurlhttps://ourspace.uregina.ca/bitstream/handle/10294/14466/Schell_Olena_PhD_PP_Fall2021.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10294/14466
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Graduate Studies and Research, University of Reginaen_US
dc.titleHealth Profession Organizations in the Health Policy Process: A Comparative Case Study of Ontario and Saskatchewanen_US
dc.typemaster thesisen_US
thesis.degree.departmentJohnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policyen_US
thesis.degree.disciplinePublic Policyen_US
thesis.degree.grantorFaculty of Graduate Studies and Research, University of Reginaen
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral -- firsten
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Schell_Olena_PhD_PP_Fall2021.pdf
Size:
1.95 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.22 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: